Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder revisiting logical programming" » "coder coder revisiting logic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder revisiting physical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder revisiting goal programming" (Expand search), "coder coder revisiting clinical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder revisiting surgical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder revisiting digital programming" (Expand search), "coder model revisiting logical programming" (Expand search), "coder after revisiting logical programming" (Expand search), "coder coli revisiting logical programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder revisiting logical programming" (Expand search), "code code revisiting logical programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec revisiting logical programming" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder revisiting logical programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder revisiting logical programming\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder revisiting logical programming ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder revisiting logical programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.