Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder revisiting lineal programming" » "coder coder revisiting linear programming" (Expand search), "coder coder revisiting linear programmin" (Expand search), "coder coder revisiting line programming" (Expand search), "coder coder revisiting ideal programming" (Expand search), "coder coder revisiting clinical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder revisiting fiscal programming" (Expand search), "coder model revisiting lineal programming" (Expand search), "coder after revisiting lineal programming" (Expand search), "coder coli revisiting lineal programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder revisiting lineal programming" (Expand search), "code code revisiting lineal programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec revisiting lineal programming" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder revisiting lineal programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder revisiting lineal programming\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder revisiting lineal programming ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder revisiting lineal programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.