Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder reused integer programming" » "coder coder reused linear programming" (Expand search), "coder coder related integer programming" (Expand search), "coder coder reduce integer programming" (Expand search), "coder coder use integer programming" (Expand search), "coder powder reused integer programming" (Expand search), "coder code reuse integer programming" (Expand search), "coder power reused integer programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder reused integer programming" (Expand search), "code code reused integer programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec reused integer programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder reused integer programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder reused integer programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder reused integer programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder reused integer programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.