Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder reuse component programming" » "coder coder reuse componentj programming" (Expand search), "coder coder reuse concorrent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder reuse computer programming" (Expand search), "coder coder house component programming" (Expand search), "coder coder reusable component programming" (Expand search), "coder coder desse componente programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder reuse component programming" (Expand search), "code code reuse component programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec reuse component programming" (Expand search), "coder code reuse component programming" (Expand search), "coder powder reuse component programming" (Expand search), "coder model reuse component programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder reuse component programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder reuse component programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder reuse component programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder reuse component programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.