Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder rethinking gender programming" » "coder coder rethinking generic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder rethinking general programming" (Expand search), "coder coder rethinking ladder programming" (Expand search), "coder tower rethinking gender programming" (Expand search), "coder borders rethinking gender programming" (Expand search), "coder towers rethinking gender programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder rethinking gender programming" (Expand search), "code code rethinking gender programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec rethinking gender programming" (Expand search)
"via python python python programming" » "via pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "via piton python python programming" (Expand search), "via pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder rethinking gender programming") OR ("via python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder rethinking gender programming\") OR (\"via python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder rethinking gender programming ) OR ( via python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder rethinking gender programming") OR ("via python python python programming"))*.