Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder response ict programming" » "coder coder response c programming" (Expand search), "coder coder response set programming" (Expand search), "coder coder response co programming" (Expand search), "coder copper response ict programming" (Expand search), "coder model response ict programming" (Expand search), "coder color response ict programming" (Expand search), "coder coder response in programming" (Expand search), "coder coder response at programming" (Expand search), "coder coder response is programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder response ict programming" (Expand search), "code code response ict programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec response ict programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder response ict programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder response ict programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder response ict programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder response ict programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.