Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder responding on programming" » "coder note responding on programming" (Expand search), "coder today responding on programming" (Expand search), "coder comment responding on programming" (Expand search), "coder coder responding in programming" (Expand search), "coder coder responding cone programming" (Expand search), "coder coder responding and programming" (Expand search), "coder coder responding to programming" (Expand search), "coder coder responding by programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder responding on programming" (Expand search), "code code responding on programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec responding on programming" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ python python pythin programming" (Expand search), "_ python python pythcone programming" (Expand search), "_ python python pythand programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder responding on programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder responding on programming\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder responding on programming ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder responding on programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.