Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder resource dependence programming" » "coder coder resource dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder resource independent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder resource dependent reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder coder pressure dependence programming" (Expand search), "coder model resource dependence programming" (Expand search), "coder mode resource dependence programming" (Expand search), "coder power resource dependence programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder resource dependence programming" (Expand search), "code code resource dependence programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec resource dependence programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder resource dependence programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder resource dependence programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder resource dependence programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder resource dependence programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.