Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder reproducing human programming" » "coder model reproducing human programming" (Expand search), "coder or reproducing human programming" (Expand search), "coder and reproducing human programming" (Expand search), "coder coder producing human programming" (Expand search), "coder coder reducing human programming" (Expand search), "coder coder reproduccion humana programming" (Expand search), "coder coder reproducing immune programming" (Expand search), "coder coder reproducing during programming" (Expand search), "coder coder reproducing erlang programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder reproducing human programming" (Expand search), "code code reproducing human programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec reproducing human programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder reproducing human programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder reproducing human programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder reproducing human programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder reproducing human programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.