Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder representation about progress" » "coder modern representation about progress" (Expand search), "coder border representation about progress" (Expand search), "coder under representation about progress" (Expand search), "coder coder representations about progress" (Expand search), "coder coder representation and progress" (Expand search), "coder coder representation an progress" (Expand search), "coder coder representation about process" (Expand search), "coder coder representation about progressive" (Expand search), "coder coder representation about problems" (Expand search), "coder decoder representation about progress" (Expand search), "code code representation about progress" (Expand search), "decoder codec representation about progress" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder representation about progress") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder representation about progress\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder representation about progress ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder representation about progress") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.