Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder relevant conic programming" » "coder coder relevant logic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder relevant cone programming" (Expand search), "coder coder relevant convex programming" (Expand search), "coder code relevant conic programming" (Expand search), "coder model relevant conic programming" (Expand search), "coder under relevant conic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder relevant chronic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder relevant choice programming" (Expand search), "coder coder relevant code programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder relevant conic programming" (Expand search), "code code relevant conic programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec relevant conic programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder relevant conic programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder relevant conic programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder relevant conic programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder relevant conic programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.