Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder reducing plc's programming" » "coder coder reducing plc programming" (Expand search), "coder coder reducing c programming" (Expand search), "coder coder reducing block programming" (Expand search), "coder copper reducing plc's programming" (Expand search), "coder model reducing plc's programming" (Expand search), "coder under reducing plc's programming" (Expand search), "coder coder reducing pellets programming" (Expand search), "coder coder reducing process programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder reducing plc's programming" (Expand search), "code code reducing plc's programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec reducing plc's programming" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder reducing plc's programming\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder reducing plc's programming ) OR ( _ python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder reducing plc's programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.