Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder reducing lineal programming" » "coder coder reducing linear programming" (Expand search), "coder coder reducing linear programmin" (Expand search), "coder coder reducing line programming" (Expand search), "coder coder reducing linnean programming" (Expand search), "coder coder producing linear programming" (Expand search), "coder coder reducing linearity programming" (Expand search), "coder copper reducing lineal programming" (Expand search), "coder model reducing lineal programming" (Expand search), "coder under reducing lineal programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder reducing lineal programming" (Expand search), "code code reducing lineal programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec reducing lineal programming" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder reducing lineal programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder reducing lineal programming\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder reducing lineal programming ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder reducing lineal programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.