Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder reducing cognitive processing" » "coder coder reducing cognitive processes" (Expand search), "coder coder reducing cognitive process" (Expand search), "coder coder predicting cognitive processing" (Expand search), "coder coder reading cognitive processing" (Expand search), "coder coder reduce cognitive processing" (Expand search), "coder copper reducing cognitive processing" (Expand search), "coder model reducing cognitive processing" (Expand search), "coder under reducing cognitive processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder reducing cognitive processing" (Expand search), "code code reducing cognitive processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec reducing cognitive processing" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder reducing cognitive processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder reducing cognitive processing\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder reducing cognitive processing ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder reducing cognitive processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.