Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder recycling dependent programming" » "coder coder recycling independent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder recycling dependent reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder coder recycling element programming" (Expand search), "coder coder cyclin dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder regarding dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder cycling independent programming" (Expand search), "coder copper recycling dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder power recycling dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder model recycling dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder recycling dependent programming" (Expand search), "code code recycling dependent programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec recycling dependent programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder recycling dependent programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder recycling dependent programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder recycling dependent programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder recycling dependent programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.