Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder recursive dependent programming" » "coder coder recursive independent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder recursive dependent reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder coder recursive element programming" (Expand search), "coder coder recursive descent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder discursive dependence programming" (Expand search), "coder novel recursive dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder control recursive dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder modelo recursivo dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder recursive dependent programming" (Expand search), "code code recursive dependent programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec recursive dependent programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder recursive dependent programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder recursive dependent programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder recursive dependent programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder recursive dependent programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.