Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder reasoning process effect" » "coder coder reasoning processes effect" (Expand search), "coder coder reasoning problems effect" (Expand search), "coder coder reading process effect" (Expand search), "coder order reasoning process effect" (Expand search), "coder models reasoning process effect" (Expand search), "coder or reasoning process effect" (Expand search), "coder coder reasoning process effects" (Expand search), "coder coder reasoning processing effect" (Expand search), "coder coder reasoning proteins effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder reasoning process effect" (Expand search), "code code reasoning process effect" (Expand search), "decoder codec reasoning process effect" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder reasoning process effect") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder reasoning process effect\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder reasoning process effect ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder reasoning process effect") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.