Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder reading machine programming" » "coder coder reading teaching programming" (Expand search), "coder coder reading reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder reading cone programming" (Expand search), "coder coder reading machines programming" (Expand search), "coder coder spreading machine programming" (Expand search), "coder coder vending machine programming" (Expand search), "coder modern reading machine programming" (Expand search), "coder model reading machine programming" (Expand search), "coder over reading machine programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder reading machine programming" (Expand search), "code code reading machine programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec reading machine programming" (Expand search)
"type static python python programming" » "type static method python programming" (Expand search), "type static pythons python programming" (Expand search), "type static piton python programming" (Expand search), "type static pitons python programming" (Expand search), "type sciatic python python programming" (Expand search), "type status python python programming" (Expand search), "type state python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder reading machine programming") OR ("type static python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder reading machine programming\") OR (\"type static python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder reading machine programming ) OR ( type static python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder reading machine programming") OR ("type static python python programming"))*.