Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder reading context effect" » "coder coder reading concept effect" (Expand search), "coder coder eating context effect" (Expand search), "coder coder trading context effect" (Expand search), "coder coder reading context effects" (Expand search), "coder coder reading content effects" (Expand search), "coder coder reading control effect" (Expand search), "coder modern reading context effect" (Expand search), "coder model reading context effect" (Expand search), "coder over reading context effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder reading context effect" (Expand search), "code code reading context effect" (Expand search), "decoder codec reading context effect" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder reading context effect") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder reading context effect\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder reading context effect ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder reading context effect") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.