Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder putative reactive programming" » "coder coder putative objective programming" (Expand search), "coder coder putative teaching programming" (Expand search), "coder coder putative declarative programming" (Expand search), "coder coder active reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder putative relation programming" (Expand search), "coder cancer putative reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder novel putative reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder other putative reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder putative reactive programming" (Expand search), "code code putative reactive programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec putative reactive programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder putative reactive programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder putative reactive programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder putative reactive programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder putative reactive programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.