Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder pulsing art objects" » "coder code using art objects" (Expand search), "coder codes using art objects" (Expand search), "coder coders using art objects" (Expand search), "coder decoder pulsing art objects" (Expand search), "code code pulsing art objects" (Expand search), "decoder codec pulsing art objects" (Expand search), "coder coder using art objects" (Expand search), "coder coder pulsing and objects" (Expand search), "coder coder pulsing with objects" (Expand search), "coder coder pulsing smart objects" (Expand search), "coder coder pulsing belt objects" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder pulsing art objects") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder pulsing art objects\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder pulsing art objects ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder pulsing art objects") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.