Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder pulsing and objects" » "coder code using and objects" (Expand search), "coder codes using and objects" (Expand search), "coder coders using and objects" (Expand search), "coder decoder pulsing and objects" (Expand search), "code code pulsing and objects" (Expand search), "decoder codec pulsing and objects" (Expand search), "coder coder pulping and objects" (Expand search), "coder coder nursing and objects" (Expand search), "coder coder parsing and objects" (Expand search), "coder coder pulsing and object" (Expand search), "coder coder pulsing and subjects" (Expand search), "coder coder pulsing and objectives" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder pulsing and objects") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder pulsing and objects\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder pulsing and objects ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder pulsing and objects") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.