Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder pruning improves programming" » "coder coder pruning improve programming" (Expand search), "coder coder pruning phones programming" (Expand search), "coder coder pruning compromise programming" (Expand search), "coder coder priming improves programming" (Expand search), "coder coder training improves programming" (Expand search), "coder coder training improve programming" (Expand search), "coder coffee pruning improves programming" (Expand search), "coder after pruning improves programming" (Expand search), "coder code running improves programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder pruning improves programming" (Expand search), "code code pruning improves programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec pruning improves programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder pruning improves programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder pruning improves programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder pruning improves programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder pruning improves programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.