Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder pruning improves program" » "coder coder priming improves program" (Expand search), "coder coder training improves program" (Expand search), "coder coder training improve program" (Expand search), "coder coder pruning improving program" (Expand search), "coder coder pruning improves problem" (Expand search), "coder coder pruning improves gram" (Expand search), "coder coffee pruning improves program" (Expand search), "coder after pruning improves program" (Expand search), "coder code running improves program" (Expand search), "coder decoder pruning improves program" (Expand search), "code code pruning improves program" (Expand search), "decoder codec pruning improves program" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder pruning improves program") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder pruning improves program\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder pruning improves program ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder pruning improves program") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.