Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder propositional study programming" » "coder model proposition study programming" (Expand search), "coder of propositional study programming" (Expand search), "coder and propositional study programming" (Expand search), "coder coder populational study programming" (Expand search), "coder coder propositional and programming" (Expand search), "coder coder crosssectional study programming" (Expand search), "coder coder propositional study programme" (Expand search), "coder coder propositional study programmes" (Expand search), "coder coder propositional tiny programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder propositional study programming" (Expand search), "code code propositional study programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec propositional study programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder propositional study programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder propositional study programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder propositional study programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder propositional study programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.