Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder programming sample condition" » "coder coder programming applet condition" (Expand search), "coder coder programming smilp condition" (Expand search), "coder coder programming single condition" (Expand search), "coder modern programming sample condition" (Expand search), "coder cone programming sample condition" (Expand search), "coder order programming sample condition" (Expand search), "coder coder programming sample conditional" (Expand search), "coder coder programming smale condition" (Expand search), "coder coder programming complex condition" (Expand search), "coder decoder programming sample condition" (Expand search), "code code programming sample condition" (Expand search), "decoder codec programming sample condition" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder programming sample condition") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder programming sample condition\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder programming sample condition ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder programming sample condition") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.