Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder programming affective state" » "coder coder programming affect state" (Expand search), "coder coder programming effects state" (Expand search), "coder coder programming alternative state" (Expand search), "coder modern programming affective state" (Expand search), "coder cone programming affective state" (Expand search), "coder order programming affective state" (Expand search), "coder coder programming affective states" (Expand search), "coder decoder programming affective state" (Expand search), "code code programming affective state" (Expand search), "decoder codec programming affective state" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder programming affective state") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder programming affective state\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder programming affective state ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder programming affective state") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.