Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder profiling to objects" » "coder code profiling to objects" (Expand search), "coder user profiling to objects" (Expand search), "coder cold profiling to objects" (Expand search), "coder coder profiling the objects" (Expand search), "coder coder profiling of objects" (Expand search), "coder coder profiling in objects" (Expand search), "coder decoder profiling to objects" (Expand search), "code code profiling to objects" (Expand search), "decoder codec profiling to objects" (Expand search), "coder coder profiling to object" (Expand search), "coder coder profiling _ objects" (Expand search), "coder coder profiling 3d objects" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder profiling to objects") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder profiling to objects\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder profiling to objects ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder profiling to objects") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.