Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder processing conic programming" » "coder coder processing logic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder processing cone programming" (Expand search), "coder coder processing convex programming" (Expand search), "coder cider processing conic programming" (Expand search), "coder powder processing conic programming" (Expand search), "coder power processing conic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder processing chain programming" (Expand search), "coder coder processing cost programming" (Expand search), "coder coder processing costs programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder processing conic programming" (Expand search), "code code processing conic programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec processing conic programming" (Expand search)
"_ pythons python python programming" » "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder processing conic programming") OR ("_ pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder processing conic programming\") OR (\"_ pythons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder processing conic programming ) OR ( _ pythons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder processing conic programming") OR ("_ pythons python python programming"))*.