Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder process sampling data" » "coder coder process damping data" (Expand search), "coder coder process simplif data" (Expand search), "coder coder process falling data" (Expand search), "coder copper process sampling data" (Expand search), "coder powder process sampling data" (Expand search), "coder border process sampling data" (Expand search), "coder coder process sampling and" (Expand search), "coder coder process sampled data" (Expand search), "coder coder process sample data" (Expand search), "coder decoder process sampling data" (Expand search), "code code process sampling data" (Expand search), "decoder codec process sampling data" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder process sampling data") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder process sampling data\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder process sampling data ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder process sampling data") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.