Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder prediction map processing" » "coder power prediction map processing" (Expand search), "coder mode prediction map processing" (Expand search), "coder color prediction map processing" (Expand search), "coder coder prediction an processing" (Expand search), "coder coder prediction at processing" (Expand search), "coder coder prediction blup processing" (Expand search), "coder coder prediction app processing" (Expand search), "coder coder prediction hhp processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder prediction map processing" (Expand search), "code code prediction map processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec prediction map processing" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder prediction map processing\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder prediction map processing ) OR ( on python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder prediction map processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.