Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder predicting primary processing" » "coder coder predicting primal processing" (Expand search), "coder coder predicting prime processing" (Expand search), "coder coder predicting pulmonary processing" (Expand search), "coder coder predicting primary progressive" (Expand search), "coder coder predicting image processing" (Expand search), "coder coder predicting dairy processing" (Expand search), "coder model predicting primary processing" (Expand search), "coder scores predicting primary processing" (Expand search), "coder models predicting primary processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder predicting primary processing" (Expand search), "code code predicting primary processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec predicting primary processing" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder predicting primary processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder predicting primary processing\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder predicting primary processing ) OR ( on python python python programming ))*.