Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder predicting persistence programming" » "coder coder predicting residence programming" (Expand search), "coder coder predicting preference programming" (Expand search), "coder coder predicting resistance programming" (Expand search), "coder coder predicting resilience programming" (Expand search), "coder coder medication persistence programming" (Expand search), "coder model predicting persistence programming" (Expand search), "coder models predicting persistence programming" (Expand search), "coder scores predicting persistence programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder predicting persistence programming" (Expand search), "code code predicting persistence programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec predicting persistence programming" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder predicting persistence programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder predicting persistence programming\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder predicting persistence programming ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder predicting persistence programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.