Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder predicting generative programming" » "coder coder predicting declarative programming" (Expand search), "coder coder predicting genetic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder predicting objective programming" (Expand search), "coder coder detecting generative programming" (Expand search), "coder coder predicting creative programming" (Expand search), "coder model predicting generative programming" (Expand search), "coder models predicting generative programming" (Expand search), "coder scores predicting generative programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder predicting generative programming" (Expand search), "code code predicting generative programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec predicting generative programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder predicting generative programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder predicting generative programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder predicting generative programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder predicting generative programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.