Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder predicting effective programming" » "coder coder predicting objective programming" (Expand search), "coder coder predicting collective programming" (Expand search), "coder coder predicting reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder promoting effective programming" (Expand search), "coder coder predictive effect programming" (Expand search), "coder coder training effective programming" (Expand search), "coder model predicting effective programming" (Expand search), "coder scores predicting effective programming" (Expand search), "coder models predicting effective programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder predicting effective programming" (Expand search), "code code predicting effective programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec predicting effective programming" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search), "manim python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder predicting effective programming") OR ("api python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder predicting effective programming\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder predicting effective programming ) OR ( api python python python programming ))*.