Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder predicting effective processes" » "coder coder promoting effective processes" (Expand search), "coder coder predictive effect processes" (Expand search), "coder coder training effective processes" (Expand search), "coder coder predicting affective processes" (Expand search), "coder coder predicting reflective processes" (Expand search), "coder coder predicting effective process" (Expand search), "coder model predicting effective processes" (Expand search), "coder models predicting effective processes" (Expand search), "coder scores predicting effective processes" (Expand search), "coder decoder predicting effective processes" (Expand search), "code code predicting effective processes" (Expand search), "decoder codec predicting effective processes" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder predicting effective processes") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder predicting effective processes\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder predicting effective processes ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder predicting effective processes") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.