Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder predicting cognitive programming" » "coder coder predicting copositive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder predicting competitive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder predicting repetitive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder predicts cognitive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder detecting cognitive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder predicting effective programming" (Expand search), "coder model predicting cognitive programming" (Expand search), "coder models predicting cognitive programming" (Expand search), "coder scores predicting cognitive programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder predicting cognitive programming" (Expand search), "code code predicting cognitive programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec predicting cognitive programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder predicting cognitive programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder predicting cognitive programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder predicting cognitive programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder predicting cognitive programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.