Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder predicting cognitive processing" » "coder coder predicts cognitive processing" (Expand search), "coder coder detecting cognitive processing" (Expand search), "coder coder predicting effective processing" (Expand search), "coder coder predicting cognitive processes" (Expand search), "coder coder predicting cognitive process" (Expand search), "coder model predicting cognitive processing" (Expand search), "coder models predicting cognitive processing" (Expand search), "coder scores predicting cognitive processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder predicting cognitive processing" (Expand search), "code code predicting cognitive processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec predicting cognitive processing" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder predicting cognitive processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder predicting cognitive processing\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder predicting cognitive processing ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder predicting cognitive processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.