Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder predicting adaptive programming" » "coder coder predicting reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder predicting adaptive programs" (Expand search), "coder coder predicting objective programming" (Expand search), "coder coder predictive adaptive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder mediating adaptive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder providing adaptive programming" (Expand search), "coder model predicting adaptive programming" (Expand search), "coder models predicting adaptive programming" (Expand search), "coder scores predicting adaptive programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder predicting adaptive programming" (Expand search), "code code predicting adaptive programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec predicting adaptive programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder predicting adaptive programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder predicting adaptive programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder predicting adaptive programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder predicting adaptive programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.