Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder predict shock programming" » "coder coder predict block programming" (Expand search), "coder coder predict choice programming" (Expand search), "coder coder predict goal programming" (Expand search), "coder model predict shock programming" (Expand search), "coder models predict shock programming" (Expand search), "coder gender predict shock programming" (Expand search), "coder coder predict stock programming" (Expand search), "coder coder predict soil programming" (Expand search), "coder coder predict shear programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder predict shock programming" (Expand search), "code code predict shock programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec predict shock programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder predict shock programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder predict shock programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder predict shock programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder predict shock programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.