Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder precoder design variable" » "coder coder precoding design variable" (Expand search), "coder coder precoder design variables" (Expand search), "coder coder precoder decision variables" (Expand search), "coder coder precoder bayesian variable" (Expand search), "coder coder decoder design variable" (Expand search), "coder decoder precoder design variable" (Expand search), "code code precoder design variable" (Expand search), "decoder codec precoder design variable" (Expand search)
"in pythons python python programming" » "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pybthon python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder precoder design variable") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder precoder design variable\") OR (\"in pythons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder precoder design variable ) OR ( in pythons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder precoder design variable") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))*.