Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder practical past processing" » "coder covert practical past processing" (Expand search), "coder model practical past processing" (Expand search), "coder poder practicas past processing" (Expand search), "coder coder practical post processing" (Expand search), "coder coder practical fast processing" (Expand search), "coder coder practical waste processing" (Expand search), "coder coder practical case processing" (Expand search), "coder coder practical class processing" (Expand search), "coder coder practical and processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder practical past processing" (Expand search), "code code practical past processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec practical past processing" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder practical past processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder practical past processing\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder practical past processing ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder practical past processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.