Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder planning to object" » "coder modern planning to object" (Expand search), "coder border planning to object" (Expand search), "coder power planning to object" (Expand search), "coder decoder planning to object" (Expand search), "code code planning to object" (Expand search), "decoder codec planning to object" (Expand search), "coder coder planning the object" (Expand search), "coder coder planning _ object" (Expand search), "coder coder planning an object" (Expand search), "coder coder planning en object" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder planning to object") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder planning to object\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder planning to object ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder planning to object") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.