Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder planning local processing" » "coder coder planning oral processing" (Expand search), "coder coder planning lexical processing" (Expand search), "coder coder planning oil processing" (Expand search), "coder modern planning local processing" (Expand search), "coder border planning local processing" (Expand search), "coder power planning local processing" (Expand search), "coder coder planning law processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder planning local processing" (Expand search), "code code planning local processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec planning local processing" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder planning local processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder planning local processing\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder planning local processing ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder planning local processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.