Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder planning functions problems" » "coder coder planning function problems" (Expand search), "coder coder planning functional problems" (Expand search), "coder coder planning actions problems" (Expand search), "coder coder planning fractional problems" (Expand search), "coder coder planning conditions problems" (Expand search), "coder modern planning functions problems" (Expand search), "coder border planning functions problems" (Expand search), "coder power planning functions problems" (Expand search), "coder decoder planning functions problems" (Expand search), "code code planning functions problems" (Expand search), "decoder codec planning functions problems" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder planning functions problems") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder planning functions problems\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder planning functions problems ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder planning functions problems") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.