Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder planning cobol programming" » "coder coder planning robot programming" (Expand search), "coder coder planning control programming" (Expand search), "coder coder planning robots programming" (Expand search), "coder modern planning cobol programming" (Expand search), "coder border planning cobol programming" (Expand search), "coder power planning cobol programming" (Expand search), "coder coder planning coronel programming" (Expand search), "coder coder planning cotton programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder planning cobol programming" (Expand search), "code code planning cobol programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec planning cobol programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder planning cobol programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder planning cobol programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder planning cobol programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder planning cobol programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.