Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder physical dependent programming" » "coder coder physical independent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder physical dependent reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder coder physical element programming" (Expand search), "coder coder physical dependence programming" (Expand search), "coder coder physical dependecy programming" (Expand search), "coder coder chemical dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder modern physical dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder powder physical dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder cyber physical dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder physical dependent programming" (Expand search), "code code physical dependent programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec physical dependent programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder physical dependent programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder physical dependent programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder physical dependent programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder physical dependent programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.