Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder perturbation based programming" » "coder holder perturbation based programming" (Expand search), "coder order perturbation based programming" (Expand search), "coder under perturbation based programming" (Expand search), "coder coder perturbation and programming" (Expand search), "coder coder permutation based programming" (Expand search), "coder coder perturbation based program" (Expand search), "coder coder perturbation cone programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder perturbation based programming" (Expand search), "code code perturbation based programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec perturbation based programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder perturbation based programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder perturbation based programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder perturbation based programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder perturbation based programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.