Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder perceived by programming" » "coder model perceived by programming" (Expand search), "coder power perceived by programming" (Expand search), "coder concern perceived by programming" (Expand search), "coder coder perceived by reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder coder perceived _ programming" (Expand search), "coder coder perceived c programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder perceived by programming" (Expand search), "code code perceived by programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec perceived by programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder perceived by programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder perceived by programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder perceived by programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder perceived by programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.