Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder patterns resulting effect" » "coder coder patterns regulating effect" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns reporting effect" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns testing effect" (Expand search), "coder cover patterns resulting effect" (Expand search), "coder border patterns resulting effect" (Expand search), "coder color patterns resulting effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder patterns resulting effect" (Expand search), "code code patterns resulting effect" (Expand search), "decoder codec patterns resulting effect" (Expand search)
"via python python python programming" » "via pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "via piton python python programming" (Expand search), "via pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder patterns resulting effect\") OR (\"via python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder patterns resulting effect ) OR ( via python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder patterns resulting effect") OR ("via python python python programming"))*.